The last fortnight had
full of red letter days for the global scientific community and national
scientific achievements. While the bedlam of noises following the discovery of
the “God particle” or the Higgs Boson, by the European organisation for Nuclear
Research (CERN) contained more energy than that used up in the Large Hadron Collider,
which was used to smash protons that culminated in the discovery, there was an
equally thunderous announcement to the world by the People’s Republic Of China of
their first ever manual docking manoeuvre being achieved in space with the Shenzhou 9 spacecraft carrying the first
Chinese female astronaut docking with the Tiangong
1 space orbiting module. This mission is part of China’s proposed space
station, targeted to be complete by 2020 which will make China the third nation
to possess such capability after USA and Russia. However, there was another
piece of news about the dragon that largely missed the limelight wherein the Jiaolong, a state owned research
submersible will make the record of reaching a depth of 7,000 metres in Mariana
Trench, the deepest part of the ocean on Earth. It will be the deepest a state
owned and a research submersible has ever gone. Interestingly though, its not the deepest man has gone in the ocean.
Now, while I leave it
to the reader to find out whom and when man has been to the deepest part of the
ocean (which is much deeper than what the
Chinese sub achieved), there was another depth to which somebody went just
a week before the above. It was the cynosure of media circus for 3-4 days In
India. It was Mahi (not Dhoni), a 5
year old girl who fell in a 70 feet deep borewell in Khaow village of Manesar
district, Haryana. It took 85 hours before her corpse could be brought out. While
it was another disgraceful example of gross civil negligence by all of us (we, the
people), the media made us forget it soon and continued on its hollow
sensationalistic schmaltz. While god may give peace to Mahi’s soul, let me ask
a question. How many of you can guess the two names hidden in the term Higgs
boson? Well, one is Peter Higgs, the British particle physicist who promulgated
the theory behind the particle’s existence back in 1964. The other name is
Bose, (BOSon) after Satyendra Nath
Bose. Still Stumped? The legend late Satyendra Nath Bose is a famous particle
physicist from India who along with Albert Einstein gave the famous Bose-Einstein Statistics which describe
the discrete energy states of a collection of indistinguishable particles. The
name ‘boson’ was given by none other than physicist Paul Dirac in honour of S N
Bose. However, in free India, the story of Indian science and Indian scientists
surpasses any Shakespearean tragedy.
The multitude of
problems facing Indian science is deep rooted and can be explained by
understanding the entire perspective first. Indian science is not product based
or IT based technological innovation. However, even technology development from
scratch is only fathomable if there is an infrastructure and promotion from the
government for research in basic sciences which can then be put to develop
newer technologies. It is basic sciences and technology development from the
scratch. Firstly, the biggest problem plaguing Indian science is the lack of
funding for hard core research from both the governments as well as the private
sector. India, in total put only a little above $10 billion for R&D last
year which is miniscule as compared to USA’s $405 billion (ranked 1 in the
world) and China’s $140 billion (please
see my previous article on blog “The Indian LSD deficiency Syndrome”). Out
of this, around $1.5 billion went for defence R&D and about the same on product
R&D used by the public and private sector companies for launching new and
upgraded products while basic sciences had to make ends meet with the remaining
crumbs.
The Indian Science
Congress, that recently completed 99 years, has become the platform for
enchanting lofty goals for science R&D by respective PMs in India but the 5year jinx continues. In 2003, the then Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee declared
to increase science and technology R&D in the country to 2% of GDP by the
end of the 10th 5 year plan (2002-2007). Then in January 2007, Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh further postponed the achieving date of the same target
till the end of the 11th plan (2007-2012) which is about to end and
the train remains at the same station, 10 years late already. While the dragon
has leapt over to 1.5% of GDP equivalent for R&D, Uncle Sam remains at the
pinnacle with 2.8% (please see previous
article “The Indian LSD Deficiency Syndrome”)
Then comes the variable
which is one of the prime indicators of the potential of a nation’s scientific
clout, the number of PhDs being produced annually and the number of cited research
papers authored by scientists and researchers. The number of PhDs produced stands
hopelessly low as compared to China and way behind that of USA and Germany. The
number of PhDs produced by India reduced a staggering 18.5% in 2008-09 to
around 10700 from 17800 in the year 2004-05. At the same time, China produced
the highest number in the world at over 50000. Also, among the number of PhDs
produced, science and science related PhDs were just around 8000 in 2008-09
which is far less than the near 20,000 churned out by China. Herein lies a deep
gutter sucking everything in courtesy the draconian devil called Indian bureaucracy.
The fact that the Indian bureaucratic system still runs on archaic British era
laws and is guided by Soviet style socialism has squandered six decades when we
could have covered a lot of ground.
Firstly, even smaller targets like getting
new equipment for labs etc. entails a long process comprising clearing proposals
with committees and tender notifications to giving contracts and getting deliveries
which take from months to years until the egos of each and every head in
between are not satisfied. Often, larger expenditures like setting up a new lab
or complex within an institute take eons as it requires the written approval from the concerned department of a central or state government ministry. Secondly,
each and every enthusiastic researcher in the state run labs and research
institutes barring a handful of premier institutes has to face the ignominy of
being a junior in the initial years since future funding and approval and
appraisal of thesis directly is in the hands of the senior professors who until
and unless themselves get pay hikes or promotions, never allow a ‘junior’ to
progress. Thirdly, the overall autonomy of many of these research facilities is
only on paper as for any moderate to high expenditure projects, the institute’s
management is at the mercy of the whims and fancies of the concerned department
which comes under a certain ministry (read
‘politicians and bureaucrats rule the roost’).
However, the Achilles heel
of basic science in India is the compartmentalization of higher education wherein,
an engineering graduate can never dream of majoring in Organic Chemistry also at
the undergraduate or postgraduate level simply because in most cases, the separate
discipline is just not available in an institute or it is not possible as per
the course structure of the concerned institute. There are colleges which provide
either arts or science or commerce degrees and very few universities have
quality multidisciplinary course structure available. And once we go to
professional course like engineering, management and medicine, they only make
you to cram up books and books in one particular field. Interdisciplinary study
and research (an entire article on this
will follow soon on my blog) simply is non-existent in India. Imagine a mathematics
graduate simultaneously graduating in biology as well!!
Well, in essence, we can be sure of not
producing the next generation of the likes of Ramanujan (mathematician), Sir CV Raman (Nobel laureate in Physics), Satyendranath Bose, Sir Jagdish Chandra Bose
(inventor of crescograph), Dr. Hargobind Khurana (studied in India and then did
research in USA) and Dr. Subramanian Chandrasekhar (Nobel laureate in Physics)
until and unless we clear the malaise that is our own creation. It is critical
for using the knowledge created within our borders to reap fruits for taking
out millions of poor Indians from the Abyss they have been languishing in for
generations. By the way, thinking about abyss reminds me of The Abyss, a sci-fi flick directed by
James Cameron (director of Titanic
and Avatar) who also happens to be
the joint world record holder of reaching the maximum depth in the Ocean when
he achieved this feat in March this year to reach the bottom of Mariana Trench
in his sub Deepsea Challenger. The
first time man went was in 1960 when US Navy Lt. Don Walsh and Swiss Oceanographer
Jacques Piccard went there in a bathyscaphe called the Trieste.
Corrigendum: In my previous post "The Indian LSD Deficiency Syndrome", the total R&D spend by China last year has been incorrectly mentioned to be around US$110 billion when it actually $140 billion.
1 comment:
Hits the core issues very effectively. Interesting read. Question: Why do we need to invest in R&D? First, there are basic grass-root problems that don't need R&D to get solved but better management and more money. Second, we are far behind the West in R&D and investing in it at this point begs the question - aside from some obvious localized problems, do we really need to invest money in basic research that ends up chasing after or replicating stuff being done in the West. Personally, I don't know what the right answer is; but the opportunity costs have to be considered and the abstract argument that science and technology leads to progress is not enough.
Post a Comment